Home Page • Conference Program • Index of Speakers • List of Attendees • Proceedings
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ Photo Gallery ~~
• Group Photo • Icebreaker Reception • Meetings & More • Awards Dinner & Entertainment • Sponsors, Exhibitors & Silent Auction • Sightseeing & Zoo Visit •


 

Print This Page

7 Back

CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS

 

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 26, 2006  

TODAY'S RESEARCH FINDINGS...
THE BASIS FOR TOMORROW'S STANDARD PRACTICES

 

 

 

Dr. Morris Villarroel

Universidad Policnica de Madrid

 Emiliano Barral 5C, 3A

Madrid,  Spain   28043

 

Tel: +34 91-415-4529

morris.villarroel@upm.es

 

 

Morris Villarroel has been carrying out research on animal transport in Spain for the past six years, first at the University of Zaragoza (Spain) and currently at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.

 

He has participated in several European projects on animal transport and its relation with animal welfare as well as meat quality. Most recently he has carried out work with Peter Kettlewell (ADAS) and Malcolm Mitchell (Roslin Welfare Associates), funded by DEFRA (UK) to analyse the transport conditions of livestock (pigs, sheep and calves) in a hot climate under different ventilation systems.

 

   [ Back to Top ]

“Behavior of Pigs and Lambs
 During 8 Hour Journeys in
 Hot Climates”

Dr. Morris VILLARROEL
Universidad Politecnica de Madrid

 

Although some physiological reactions to transport have been well studied in several domestic species, less is known about behavioural patterns during the journey. External stressors during transport include noise levels and vibrations and the characteristics of the circulating air flows (temperature, relative humidity, pressure and wind). As part of the Defra funded project AW0815, an in depth analysis of pig behaviour was made during transport for two 8 h journeys in the summer (July) of 2004 (in Spain), taking into account their vertical (lying or standing) and horizontal (parallel or perpendicular to traffic) positions during the trip and whether animals were standing, walking or lying. Two weeks later a similar study was carried out on lambs. Video cameras were set up in one pen above the floor loaded with the animals. For statistical analysis, three periods were compared, the first two hours of the journey (period 1), the rest period where the truck was not moving (period 2) and the remaining two hours of the journey (period 3).

 

The number of pigs lying down varied significantly among the three transport periods, with more lying in period 2. The number of pigs in a parallel position to the direction of traffic also changed significantly among the three periods, with more in period 3. The number of animals that moved was also different in the three periods, and slightly higher in the resting period (period 2), which was also when we observed more agonistic interactions were observed, mostly involving one of the pigs who bit neighbours. It was more difficult to observe the number of lambs lying down or sitting (than with the pigs), due to the quality of the image and the number of lambs (n=40). The number of animals standing varied significantly with the period, being much lower in period 2 (more standing during transport in periods 1 and 3). The number of animals parallel to the direction of traffic was significantly different in the three, being higher in period 1.

 

In conclusion, behavioural analyses during journeys under hot weather conditions in Spain for both pigs and sheep demonstrated that the animals preferred to remain standing while the vehicle was in motion and the majority only began to lie down while the vehicle was at rest. More animals tended to lie down as the journey progressed but other welfare indicators and environmental measurements suggested that animal welfare was not seriously affected.

 

PowerPoint Presentation

 

Dr. Malcolm Mitchell,
BSc., PhD., M.Biol, C.Biol

Roslin Welfare Consultants

12 Charlton Grove

Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9NX UK

 

Tel: +44 0131 440 27 66

Malcolm.mitchell5@btinternet.com



Dr. Malcolm Mitchell is a physiologist by training, graduating from the University of Sheffield with a First Class Honours Degree in Human and Animal Physiology.  His PhD was awarded in 1976. His post-doctoral studies focused upon topics in both animal and human physiology. In 1981 he joined the Poultry Research Centre in Roslin to lead the Environmental Physiology team and in the same year initiated a novel research programme examining animal transportation with particular emphasis upon poultry in transit. At this time Dr. Mitchell began his collaboration in animal transportation research with Peter Kettlewell of the Silsoe Research Institute, which continues to this day. Their collaborative research programme has uniquely combined expertise in animal physiology, physiological stress, environmental physiology, environmental physics and engineering and projects have addressed many aspects of animal handling and transportation.  In particular the research has provided insight into as well as some practical solutions to the challenges of transport thermal environments and vehicle ventilation. The studies have examined the transport of many different species and the efficacy of the work in relation to practical applications in commercial animal transport has been recognised by a number of awards to both Dr. Mitchell and Mr. Kettlewell.  They have published widely in the field and have contributed to numerous EU committees and working parties on animal transport and welfare as well as providing information to inform DEFRA policy in the UK.  Malcolm and Peter have provided research findings that form the basis of European and UK Legislation and codes of practice relating to commercial animal transport.  
 

In 2005 Malcolm and Peter both parted company with their respective research organisations (Roslin Institute and Silsoe Research Institute respectively).  Malcolm is now based at the Scottish Agricultural College in Edinburgh, Scotland as well as heading up Roslin Welfare Consultants and Peter is with ADAS based at Boxworth in England.  Dr. Mitchell is a regular participant in AATA conferences and has presented several papers at previous meetings.
 

[ Back to Top ]

“Animals in Transit - Body Temeratures:
 Why, How, When, and
 What do they Mean?”

Dr. Malcom MITCHELL, BSc., PhD., M.Biol, C.Biol

Scottish Agricultural College in Edinburgh, Scotland

Roslin Welfare Consultants  

Research in collaboration with Mr. Peter Kettlewell

            

It is well established that the thermal micro-environment experienced by animals during transportation can constitute a major risk to their health and welfare.  Thus it is accepted that high thermal loads will cause body temperature to rise (hyperthermia) and cold conditions may induce a state of hypothermia (see 1Guide to the Ventilation of Livestock during Transport and 2Livestock Transport Vehicles: A guide to best practice for vehicle ventilation). The concerns associated with thermal stress in transit are reflected in the more recent legislation and codes of practice introduced in many regions of the world. For example in the European Union, Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005, “On the protection of animals during transport and related operations” and supporting directives prescribe specific temperature limits and ventilation requirements to minimize the risk of thermal stress in transported animals. 

In addition from 2007 all new vehicles (and all vehicles from 2009) must be fitted with appropriate GPS systems for recording of vehicle locations during the transportation of animals.  It has been proposed recently that such a system might be augmented to provide information upon thermal conditions within the vehicle or that the collection of such data might be incorporated in to the design of a smart card similar to those that will be in mandatory use from May 2006 in Europe in the “digital tachograph system”. Clearly the importance of understanding thermal stress and therefore of thermoregulation in the transported species is paramount. Whilst it appears that “body temperature” is a basic and understandable concept and that its measurement and interpretation should be simple this may not be the case.  The site and methods of measurements may profoundly influence the values obtained and the time of measurement is important to interpretation of the findings in relation to events or conditions during transportation.  Body temperature may be measured in the body core (“true body temperature”) or at some more easily accessible peripheral site.  Surface or skin temperature may be measured and related to core temperature in some way.  Temperature may be monitored continuously by devices attached to or implanted in the animal (e.g. radio-telemetry) or may be measured at a single time point (e.g. rectal temperature using a clinical thermometer).  In the transport research environment methods may be more sophisticated and complex than in a commercial setting and may also be more invasive.  These methods, however, must provide information that can be usefully extrapolated to commercial animal transport and must inform the development of devices or approaches which, in future, can facilitate better understanding of thermoregulation in transit and underpin improvements in transport practices.   

This review addresses the basic concepts of thermoregulatory physiology in relation to animal transport and reports research findings on a range of methodologies including infra-red non contact thermometry, radio-telemetry of deep body temperature, measurement of body temperature by implanted passive transponder and simple clinical thermometers as applied to pigs, cattle and sheep.  The research reported has provided the basis for identification of “best practice” in body temperature monitoring for transport studies and discusses how the methods and information may be utilized in the future in relation to monitoring animals on commercial journeys and for the purposes of improving transport environments and practices as well as informing legislation.

1 http://www.aata-animaltransport.org/Publications.htm
2
http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/welfare/farmed/transport/guideandpub.htm


  PowerPoint Presentation
 

Dr. Renée Bergeron, PhD agr  Département des Sciences Animales

Université Laval, Québec, QC

Canada, G1K 7P4

 

Tel.: +1 418-656-2131 ext 5950

Fax: +1 418-656-3766    

renee.bergeron@san.ulaval.ca

Dr. Renée Bergeron is a professor of animal behaviour and welfare at Laval University, Québec, Canada. She completed a B.Sc. in animal science and a M.Sc. in animal nutrition at Laval University. She received a Ph.D. in animal behaviour from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.  Renée is a member of the Canadian Society of Animal Science and of the International Society for Applied Ethology, and served on several committees working on welfare standards.

Her main research interests are the effects of nutritional and environmental factors on the behaviour and welfare of farm animals.  She also works on animal stress related to handling, transportation and pre-slaughter management, and its effects on animal welfare, physiology and meat quality.  As a member of the IATA Animal Care Team, she participates in the annual revision of the Live Animal Regulations.

 

 

   [ Back to Top ]

“The Role of the IATA Animal Care Team
 and It's Impact on the Live Animals
 Regulations (LAR)”

Dr. Renée BERGERON, PhD., agr.
Professor, Animal Science Department,
Laval University


With regard to animal welfare, transportation presents a considerable challenge. Indeed, transportation is generally stressful for both wild and domestic animals. Wild animals may be even more prone to stress, as they have generally less experience with close confinement and proximity to humans. Their physical and behavioural needs may also be more difficult to satisfy. In the context of animal transportation, stress may increase the risk of injuries, diseases and mortality. Stress factors during transportation include novelty, noise, vibrations, movement, temperature, ventilation, mixing, stocking density, fasting, etc. Good animal care during transport is important to reduce the negative impacts of these stress factors. Efforts must be made to provide animals with conditions that minimize periods without food and/or water, make them as comfortable as possible, avoid injuries, allow social contacts whenever possible and reduce fear and distress.

 

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) Live Animal Regulations (LAR) provides guidelines to optimise air transportation conditions. For instance, it contains information on animal behaviour, general and specific container requirements, as well as handling procedures.

 

In the process of reviewing and updating the LAR, IATA calls upon a team of animal specialists to serve as scientific advisors. Each member of the IATA Animal Care Team has a specific area of scientific expertise, namely wild, domestic or laboratory animals. When reviewing the proposals of amendment to the LAR, the Animal Care Team uses scientific data from transportation experiments as much as possible. But even though transportation stress may be evaluated scientifically, very few studies have been done on air transportation, and even less on transportation of wild animals. Most studies concern domestic species transported by road. Therefore, the Animal Care Team members also rely on their knowledge of general welfare principles and of the biology of the species concerned. They also base their decisions on the practical experience of animal experts who ship animals, and airlines who carry them.

 

Recent examples of changes to the LAR include a new container requirement for laboratory SPF animals (CR 84), as well as container requirements for the transportation of koala (amendment to CR 31). As air transportation intensifies and scientific research progresses, further improvements to the LAR will be carried out.


 PowerPoint Presentation

 

PRODUCTS & SERVICES FOR ANIMAL SHIPPERS

Dr. Peter M. Grosser

Plant Health Attaché

USDA-APHIS-International Services 

US Mission to the EU

Boulevard du Regent 27

1000 Brussels, Belgium

 

Tel:  + 32 2 508-2762

Fax: + 32 2 511-0918

Peter.M.Grosser@aphis.usda.gov

 

Pete Grosser began his Federal Career with the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service as a Plant Quarantine Inspector at JFK International Airport, Jamaica, New York in 1969.

 

In 1976 he was promoted to Plant Disease Specialist and transferred to the Port of New York assigned to the Hoboken, New Jersey, Plant Inspection Station. He returned to JFK in 1982 as Officer in Charge of the JFK Plant Inspection Station. In 1991 he was promoted to Senior Operations Officer, Import Services at APHIS headquarters in Hyattsville, Maryland. In 1999-2003, he was assigned to the APHIS, International Services office in Mexico City as Assistant Regional Director/APHIS Attaché.

 

His next post was Ottawa, Canada where he served until September 2005 prior to his posting in October 2005 to the United States Mission to the EU, Brussels, Belgium as APHIS Attaché.

    [ Back to Top ]
 

“Working Your Way through
 the WPM Maze”
 

 

Dr. Peter M. GROSSER

Plant Health Attaché

USDA, APHIS,  International Services

US Mission To the EU  

 

Wood Packaging Materials (WPM) made from unprocessed wood is a pathway for the introduction and spread of plant pests. Dutch Elm Disease, Asian Longhorned Beetle and Emerald Ash Borer are three of the more notorious pests linked to imports of unprocessed lumber and wood from off continent sources.

 

International standards for phytosanitary measures are prepared by the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) as part of the UN Foreign Agriculture Office (FAO) mandate on harmonized global policy and technical assistance in plant quarantine matters.. The goal is to achieve international harmonization of phytosanitary measures and facilitate trade by avoiding unjustified barriers to trade.

 

ISPM 15-Guidelines for Regulating WPM in International Trade were endorsed by the Interim Commission on Phytosanitary Measures in March 2002. The Standard describes the minimum measures needed to reduce the risk of introduction and spread of harmful quarantine pests associated with WPM (including dunnage) in international trade.

 

The presentation will provide the necessary tools and means for determining those WPM’s subject to the International standard and those articles that are exempt from the requirements. 

 

 

 PowerPoint Presentation
 

   [ Back to Top ]

“Sea Transport: Fast Ferry
 Roll-On / Roll-Off”
 

 

 

Mr. Henk VAN DOMMELEN

H. Van Dommelen Veetransport

   

 PowerPoint Presentation

Mr. Van Dommelen was born and raised in the Netherlands. Henk is the owner and manager of H. Van Dommelen Veetransport which is specialised in stocking, exporting and transporting of livestock all over the world.

 

When he started in this business over 37 years ago, he began working with his sister and they worked together for 2 years.  They both were drivers in the early days of the company start-up.

 

H. Van Dommelen Veetransport has been trucking livestock inside and out of Europe for 24 years. 
 

 

Mr. Peter Stevenson

Compassion in World Farming

Charles House

5a Charles Street

Petersfield, Hants

GU32 3 EH England, UK

                                       

Tel.: + 44 1730 26 42 08

Fax: + 44 1730 26 07 91

http://www.ciwf.org

 

 [ Back to Top ]

“A New Resource for Ensuring Animal Welfare: A Ready Reference to the OIE's New Transport Guidelines”

Mr. Peter STEVENSON
Compassion in World Farming

 

Presentation (Word)

PowerPoint Presentation

7 Back

[   Back to Top  ]

 


Visitors: Hit Counter

 

Last Updated: 13-Sep-2006


www.aata-animaltransport.org

AATA INTERNATIONAL OFFICE
111 East Loop North - Houston, Texas 77029 USA
Tel:    +1 713.532.2177
= Fax:   +1 713.532.2166
Email

For suggestions or problems with this website, please contact AATA's Webmaster